Celeron N4020 vs Core Ultra 9 285K
The Celeron N4020 is slower than the Core Ultra 9 285K on average across 100+ games. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
HowManyFPS Team · Prices updated · FPS from real gameplay sessions · Browse benchmarks
FPS Comparison Across Popular Games
Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.
Specs & Benchmark Comparison
Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.
Base Frequencyhelp
Core Ultra 9 285K has a 236% higher base clock.
Turbo Frequencyhelp
Core Ultra 9 285K boosts 104% higher.
Integrated
Sockethelp
LGA1851-
Codenamehelp
Arrow Lake-SMobile
Segmenthelp
DesktopUHD Graphics 600 Mobile
Integrated GPUhelp
Arc Graphics 4 Xe LPGRAMhelp
6400 MHz (DDR5)Not Overclockable
Overclock Supporthelp
OverclockableFrequently Asked Questions
compare_arrowsWhich is better, Celeron N4020 or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 285K. It's 318% faster than the Celeron N4020 on average across 100+ games, scoring 71/100 vs 17/100 in our gaming rating.
speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 9 285K than Celeron N4020?expand_more
318% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.
aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Celeron N4020 or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 285K is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.
paidIs the Core Ultra 9 285K worth buying in 2026?expand_more
It scores 71/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.
differenceWhat is the difference between Celeron N4020 and Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more
Performance: Celeron N4020 scores 17/100, Core Ultra 9 285K scores 71/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.
compressWill the Celeron N4020 or Core Ultra 9 285K bottleneck my PC?expand_more
Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.
upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Celeron N4020 or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 285K is the stronger pick at 71/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.
Popular Comparisons
Celeron N4020 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3DCeleron N4020 vs Ryzen 5 7600XCeleron N4020 vs Ryzen 9 9950X3DCeleron N4020 vs Ryzen 7 7700XCeleron N4020 vs Ryzen 9 9900XCeleron N4020 vs Ryzen 7 9850X3DCeleron N4020 vs Ryzen 7 9700XCeleron N4020 vs Ryzen 5 8500GCeleron N4020 vs Ultra 7 265KFCeleron N4020 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3DCeleron N4020 vs Ryzen 5 7500X3DAtom D510 vs Celeron N4020Athlon II X2 240 vs Celeron N4020Celeron N4020 vs Ryzen 7 9800X3DCeleron N4020 vs Pentium E5400Celeron N4020 vs Ultra 5 245KCeleron N4020 vs Ultra 5 245KFUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 7 7800X3DUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 7600XUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 9 9950X3DUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 7 7700XUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 9 9900XUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 7 9850X3DUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 7 9700XUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 8500GUltra 7 265KF vs Ultra 9 285KUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 9 9900X3DUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 7500X3DAtom D510 vs Ultra 9 285KAthlon II X2 240 vs Ultra 9 285KUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 7 9800X3DUltra 9 285K vs Pentium E5400Ultra 5 245K vs Ultra 9 285KUltra 5 245KF vs Ultra 9 285K